Review





Similar Products

99
Thermo Fisher homology directed repair hdr dna template design
Homology Directed Repair Hdr Dna Template Design, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/homology directed repair hdr dna template design/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
homology directed repair hdr dna template design - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Danaher Inc oligonucleotide ssodn hdr repair template
Oligonucleotide Ssodn Hdr Repair Template, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/oligonucleotide ssodn hdr repair template/product/Danaher Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
oligonucleotide ssodn hdr repair template - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Amaxa homology-directed repair (hdr) template (171 nt ssodns)
Homology Directed Repair (Hdr) Template (171 Nt Ssodns), supplied by Amaxa, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/homology-directed repair (hdr) template (171 nt ssodns)/product/Amaxa
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
homology-directed repair (hdr) template (171 nt ssodns) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Thermo Fisher ssodn hdr repair template dna
Ssodn Hdr Repair Template Dna, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ssodn hdr repair template dna/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ssodn hdr repair template dna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Santa Cruz Biotechnology ext1 homology directed repair hdr template plasmids
Fig. 2 The level of GlcAT-II activity in EXTL3ΔN preparations exhibits substantial dependence on the level of <t>EXT1</t> contamination. EXTL3ΔN was prepared from the culture medium of regular EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells (EXTL3ΔN), EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells transfected with a non-specific CRISPR- Cas9 control construct (EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol), or EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells transfected with a CRISPR-Cas9 construct targeting EXT1 (EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1). a The relative abundance of EXTL3(ΔN), EXT1, and EXT2 in the three different preparations was determined by mass spectrometry/label-free quantification. The lower limit of detection corresponds to approximately 106 arbitrary units. For numerical values, as well as the top ten most abundant proteins, see Supplementary Table 3. Each dataset was obtained from a single biological replicate. b–e Comparison of GlcNAcT-II and GlcAT-II activities of EXTL3ΔN, EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol, and EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1 preparation, visualised by PACE. For both activities, five independent assays were carried out using the same biological enzyme preparation (i.e. n = 5 technical replicates for each treatment) to account for potential technical variability. b, d GlcNAcT-II activity: DP8 acceptor was treated with enzyme in the presence of UDP-GlcNAc, MnCl2, and MgCl2. c, e GlcAT-II activity: DP9 acceptor was treated with enzyme in the presence of UDP-GlcA, MnCl2, and MgCl2. Reactions were then split in two; each half was terminated after 15 or 60 min, respectively. b, c Representative PACE gels for GlcNAcT-II and GlcAT-II 60 min time points, respectively. d, e Percentage substrate conversion at the two different time points was determined by densitometry. Dots represent individual measurements, crosses represent group means, and error bars represent standard error of the mean. Statistics: one-way ANOVA (two-tailed) with Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD); NS no significant difference * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. GlcNAcT-II ANOVA: F2,12 = 0.75, p = 0.49 (15 min); F2,12 = 2.23, p = 0.15 (60 min). GlcAT-II ANOVA: F2,12 = 21.09, p = 1.18 × 10−4 (15 min); F2,12 = 36.2, p = 8.29 × 10−6 (60 min). GlcAT-II Tukey’s HSD between EXTL3ΔN (1), EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol (2), and EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1 (3): p = 0.0149 (1~2), p = 0.0213 (1~3), p = 8.15 × 10−4 (2~3) (15 min); p = 0.0479 (1~2), p = 0.00187 (1~3), p = 5.6 × 10−6 (2~3) (60 min).
Ext1 Homology Directed Repair Hdr Template Plasmids, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ext1 homology directed repair hdr template plasmids/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ext1 homology directed repair hdr template plasmids - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Santa Cruz Biotechnology repair hdr template plasmids
Fig. 2 The level of GlcAT-II activity in EXTL3ΔN preparations exhibits substantial dependence on the level of <t>EXT1</t> contamination. EXTL3ΔN was prepared from the culture medium of regular EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells (EXTL3ΔN), EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells transfected with a non-specific CRISPR- Cas9 control construct (EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol), or EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells transfected with a CRISPR-Cas9 construct targeting EXT1 (EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1). a The relative abundance of EXTL3(ΔN), EXT1, and EXT2 in the three different preparations was determined by mass spectrometry/label-free quantification. The lower limit of detection corresponds to approximately 106 arbitrary units. For numerical values, as well as the top ten most abundant proteins, see Supplementary Table 3. Each dataset was obtained from a single biological replicate. b–e Comparison of GlcNAcT-II and GlcAT-II activities of EXTL3ΔN, EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol, and EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1 preparation, visualised by PACE. For both activities, five independent assays were carried out using the same biological enzyme preparation (i.e. n = 5 technical replicates for each treatment) to account for potential technical variability. b, d GlcNAcT-II activity: DP8 acceptor was treated with enzyme in the presence of UDP-GlcNAc, MnCl2, and MgCl2. c, e GlcAT-II activity: DP9 acceptor was treated with enzyme in the presence of UDP-GlcA, MnCl2, and MgCl2. Reactions were then split in two; each half was terminated after 15 or 60 min, respectively. b, c Representative PACE gels for GlcNAcT-II and GlcAT-II 60 min time points, respectively. d, e Percentage substrate conversion at the two different time points was determined by densitometry. Dots represent individual measurements, crosses represent group means, and error bars represent standard error of the mean. Statistics: one-way ANOVA (two-tailed) with Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD); NS no significant difference * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. GlcNAcT-II ANOVA: F2,12 = 0.75, p = 0.49 (15 min); F2,12 = 2.23, p = 0.15 (60 min). GlcAT-II ANOVA: F2,12 = 21.09, p = 1.18 × 10−4 (15 min); F2,12 = 36.2, p = 8.29 × 10−6 (60 min). GlcAT-II Tukey’s HSD between EXTL3ΔN (1), EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol (2), and EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1 (3): p = 0.0149 (1~2), p = 0.0213 (1~3), p = 8.15 × 10−4 (2~3) (15 min); p = 0.0479 (1~2), p = 0.00187 (1~3), p = 5.6 × 10−6 (2~3) (60 min).
Repair Hdr Template Plasmids, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/repair hdr template plasmids/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
repair hdr template plasmids - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GenScript corporation homology directed repair (hdr) template
Fig. 2 The level of GlcAT-II activity in EXTL3ΔN preparations exhibits substantial dependence on the level of <t>EXT1</t> contamination. EXTL3ΔN was prepared from the culture medium of regular EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells (EXTL3ΔN), EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells transfected with a non-specific CRISPR- Cas9 control construct (EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol), or EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells transfected with a CRISPR-Cas9 construct targeting EXT1 (EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1). a The relative abundance of EXTL3(ΔN), EXT1, and EXT2 in the three different preparations was determined by mass spectrometry/label-free quantification. The lower limit of detection corresponds to approximately 106 arbitrary units. For numerical values, as well as the top ten most abundant proteins, see Supplementary Table 3. Each dataset was obtained from a single biological replicate. b–e Comparison of GlcNAcT-II and GlcAT-II activities of EXTL3ΔN, EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol, and EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1 preparation, visualised by PACE. For both activities, five independent assays were carried out using the same biological enzyme preparation (i.e. n = 5 technical replicates for each treatment) to account for potential technical variability. b, d GlcNAcT-II activity: DP8 acceptor was treated with enzyme in the presence of UDP-GlcNAc, MnCl2, and MgCl2. c, e GlcAT-II activity: DP9 acceptor was treated with enzyme in the presence of UDP-GlcA, MnCl2, and MgCl2. Reactions were then split in two; each half was terminated after 15 or 60 min, respectively. b, c Representative PACE gels for GlcNAcT-II and GlcAT-II 60 min time points, respectively. d, e Percentage substrate conversion at the two different time points was determined by densitometry. Dots represent individual measurements, crosses represent group means, and error bars represent standard error of the mean. Statistics: one-way ANOVA (two-tailed) with Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD); NS no significant difference * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. GlcNAcT-II ANOVA: F2,12 = 0.75, p = 0.49 (15 min); F2,12 = 2.23, p = 0.15 (60 min). GlcAT-II ANOVA: F2,12 = 21.09, p = 1.18 × 10−4 (15 min); F2,12 = 36.2, p = 8.29 × 10−6 (60 min). GlcAT-II Tukey’s HSD between EXTL3ΔN (1), EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol (2), and EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1 (3): p = 0.0149 (1~2), p = 0.0213 (1~3), p = 8.15 × 10−4 (2~3) (15 min); p = 0.0479 (1~2), p = 0.00187 (1~3), p = 5.6 × 10−6 (2~3) (60 min).
Homology Directed Repair (Hdr) Template, supplied by GenScript corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/homology directed repair (hdr) template/product/GenScript corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
homology directed repair (hdr) template - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Addgene inc hdr repair template plasmids
Fig. 2 The level of GlcAT-II activity in EXTL3ΔN preparations exhibits substantial dependence on the level of <t>EXT1</t> contamination. EXTL3ΔN was prepared from the culture medium of regular EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells (EXTL3ΔN), EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells transfected with a non-specific CRISPR- Cas9 control construct (EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol), or EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells transfected with a CRISPR-Cas9 construct targeting EXT1 (EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1). a The relative abundance of EXTL3(ΔN), EXT1, and EXT2 in the three different preparations was determined by mass spectrometry/label-free quantification. The lower limit of detection corresponds to approximately 106 arbitrary units. For numerical values, as well as the top ten most abundant proteins, see Supplementary Table 3. Each dataset was obtained from a single biological replicate. b–e Comparison of GlcNAcT-II and GlcAT-II activities of EXTL3ΔN, EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol, and EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1 preparation, visualised by PACE. For both activities, five independent assays were carried out using the same biological enzyme preparation (i.e. n = 5 technical replicates for each treatment) to account for potential technical variability. b, d GlcNAcT-II activity: DP8 acceptor was treated with enzyme in the presence of UDP-GlcNAc, MnCl2, and MgCl2. c, e GlcAT-II activity: DP9 acceptor was treated with enzyme in the presence of UDP-GlcA, MnCl2, and MgCl2. Reactions were then split in two; each half was terminated after 15 or 60 min, respectively. b, c Representative PACE gels for GlcNAcT-II and GlcAT-II 60 min time points, respectively. d, e Percentage substrate conversion at the two different time points was determined by densitometry. Dots represent individual measurements, crosses represent group means, and error bars represent standard error of the mean. Statistics: one-way ANOVA (two-tailed) with Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD); NS no significant difference * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. GlcNAcT-II ANOVA: F2,12 = 0.75, p = 0.49 (15 min); F2,12 = 2.23, p = 0.15 (60 min). GlcAT-II ANOVA: F2,12 = 21.09, p = 1.18 × 10−4 (15 min); F2,12 = 36.2, p = 8.29 × 10−6 (60 min). GlcAT-II Tukey’s HSD between EXTL3ΔN (1), EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol (2), and EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1 (3): p = 0.0149 (1~2), p = 0.0213 (1~3), p = 8.15 × 10−4 (2~3) (15 min); p = 0.0479 (1~2), p = 0.00187 (1~3), p = 5.6 × 10−6 (2~3) (60 min).
Hdr Repair Template Plasmids, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/hdr repair template plasmids/product/Addgene inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hdr repair template plasmids - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Fig. 2 The level of GlcAT-II activity in EXTL3ΔN preparations exhibits substantial dependence on the level of EXT1 contamination. EXTL3ΔN was prepared from the culture medium of regular EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells (EXTL3ΔN), EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells transfected with a non-specific CRISPR- Cas9 control construct (EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol), or EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells transfected with a CRISPR-Cas9 construct targeting EXT1 (EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1). a The relative abundance of EXTL3(ΔN), EXT1, and EXT2 in the three different preparations was determined by mass spectrometry/label-free quantification. The lower limit of detection corresponds to approximately 106 arbitrary units. For numerical values, as well as the top ten most abundant proteins, see Supplementary Table 3. Each dataset was obtained from a single biological replicate. b–e Comparison of GlcNAcT-II and GlcAT-II activities of EXTL3ΔN, EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol, and EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1 preparation, visualised by PACE. For both activities, five independent assays were carried out using the same biological enzyme preparation (i.e. n = 5 technical replicates for each treatment) to account for potential technical variability. b, d GlcNAcT-II activity: DP8 acceptor was treated with enzyme in the presence of UDP-GlcNAc, MnCl2, and MgCl2. c, e GlcAT-II activity: DP9 acceptor was treated with enzyme in the presence of UDP-GlcA, MnCl2, and MgCl2. Reactions were then split in two; each half was terminated after 15 or 60 min, respectively. b, c Representative PACE gels for GlcNAcT-II and GlcAT-II 60 min time points, respectively. d, e Percentage substrate conversion at the two different time points was determined by densitometry. Dots represent individual measurements, crosses represent group means, and error bars represent standard error of the mean. Statistics: one-way ANOVA (two-tailed) with Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD); NS no significant difference * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. GlcNAcT-II ANOVA: F2,12 = 0.75, p = 0.49 (15 min); F2,12 = 2.23, p = 0.15 (60 min). GlcAT-II ANOVA: F2,12 = 21.09, p = 1.18 × 10−4 (15 min); F2,12 = 36.2, p = 8.29 × 10−6 (60 min). GlcAT-II Tukey’s HSD between EXTL3ΔN (1), EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol (2), and EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1 (3): p = 0.0149 (1~2), p = 0.0213 (1~3), p = 8.15 × 10−4 (2~3) (15 min); p = 0.0479 (1~2), p = 0.00187 (1~3), p = 5.6 × 10−6 (2~3) (60 min).

Journal: Nature communications

Article Title: The structure of EXTL3 helps to explain the different roles of bi-domain exostosins in heparan sulfate synthesis.

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31048-2

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 2 The level of GlcAT-II activity in EXTL3ΔN preparations exhibits substantial dependence on the level of EXT1 contamination. EXTL3ΔN was prepared from the culture medium of regular EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells (EXTL3ΔN), EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells transfected with a non-specific CRISPR- Cas9 control construct (EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol), or EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells transfected with a CRISPR-Cas9 construct targeting EXT1 (EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1). a The relative abundance of EXTL3(ΔN), EXT1, and EXT2 in the three different preparations was determined by mass spectrometry/label-free quantification. The lower limit of detection corresponds to approximately 106 arbitrary units. For numerical values, as well as the top ten most abundant proteins, see Supplementary Table 3. Each dataset was obtained from a single biological replicate. b–e Comparison of GlcNAcT-II and GlcAT-II activities of EXTL3ΔN, EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol, and EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1 preparation, visualised by PACE. For both activities, five independent assays were carried out using the same biological enzyme preparation (i.e. n = 5 technical replicates for each treatment) to account for potential technical variability. b, d GlcNAcT-II activity: DP8 acceptor was treated with enzyme in the presence of UDP-GlcNAc, MnCl2, and MgCl2. c, e GlcAT-II activity: DP9 acceptor was treated with enzyme in the presence of UDP-GlcA, MnCl2, and MgCl2. Reactions were then split in two; each half was terminated after 15 or 60 min, respectively. b, c Representative PACE gels for GlcNAcT-II and GlcAT-II 60 min time points, respectively. d, e Percentage substrate conversion at the two different time points was determined by densitometry. Dots represent individual measurements, crosses represent group means, and error bars represent standard error of the mean. Statistics: one-way ANOVA (two-tailed) with Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD); NS no significant difference * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. GlcNAcT-II ANOVA: F2,12 = 0.75, p = 0.49 (15 min); F2,12 = 2.23, p = 0.15 (60 min). GlcAT-II ANOVA: F2,12 = 21.09, p = 1.18 × 10−4 (15 min); F2,12 = 36.2, p = 8.29 × 10−6 (60 min). GlcAT-II Tukey’s HSD between EXTL3ΔN (1), EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol (2), and EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1 (3): p = 0.0149 (1~2), p = 0.0213 (1~3), p = 8.15 × 10−4 (2~3) (15 min); p = 0.0479 (1~2), p = 0.00187 (1~3), p = 5.6 × 10−6 (2~3) (60 min).

Article Snippet: The EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1 cells were then further transfected with a set of EXT1 homology-directed repair (HDR) template plasmids (EXT1 HDR Plasmid (h), sc-404635-HDR; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for permanent expression according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Techniques: Activity Assay, Expressing, Transfection, CRISPR, Control, Construct, Mass Spectrometry, Comparison, Two Tailed Test